I don't care if I am there are not! Rather, I
will opt not to be there when the approach is so. But what I care is
how it is done, since I have right to care. As said in my earlier mail: All one may understand here is that the members of NIXI are ISPs and registrars. Whereas, members for NIR are Corporates, Independent Companies (not necessarily are peering to any ISP that is member of NIXI), Defence establishments, Financial Institutions, IT companies, Manufacturing companies, Educational institutions etc who have nothing to do with NIXI. So, the "need" neither addressed them nor the "cause" explains the same since the only document that is available talks about NIXI / ISPAI / DoT / TRAI.... Also, if NIXI has to form the NIR, I don't see a situation where NIXI will alter its board for the cause of NIR to include other members of NIR! Hence, neutrality cannot be achieved since the dominance is of NIXI members, unless a separate Section 25 is established as "by members", "for member" and "to members". Greetings, Kusumba S kramvir singh wrote:
|