While I appreciate your reasoning, the concerns
will not be addressed till such time the documents are published and
made public. No one, including me said that NIR in India should not be formed! However, the reasons attributed to it and the comments on the mails represented that there is no clarity on the formation of NIR since there is no evidence of alignment with International community and best practices. Some additional comments even raised doubts if NIR is being looked as a "problem-solving" solution or "community participation" system for India. Added to that are the "emotions" of angular momentums and tendencies of something going off the tangent that allows one to think if there is a defined system for establishing, running, managing and consistently ensuring protection of global resources and procedures through or at NIR in India, if formed. To rule out all this, all you could do is, establish those simple procedural documents and make things clear. If you intend not to do, for whatever the reason you wish to attribute to such as "criteria", "compliance", etc etc etc... , this discussion is void! Ofcourse, irrespective of anything here, APNIC can always look at outsourcing or relocating some of the operations to cost effective countries, something that I mentioned two years back too! Greetings, Kusumba S kramvir singh wrote:
|