Check my comments below: kramvir singh wrote: Kusumba S >>> Please correct... there is no acknowledgment and at the same time there is no objection! No objection cannot be attributed to acknowledgment. As I clarified in my last mail, unless the documents and neutrality is established, it is difficult to get convinced. When I say neutrality, it is "by members", "for member" and "to members" from top of the organization to the ground. Without which, it is never neutral but a compromise for no reason. Kusumba S >>> NIR did not raise outsourcing issue. As again, you may have missed, I have mentioned this in detail about two years back! Kusumba S >>> Ofcourse, would have been the first to do it when I find neutrality. As a matter of fact, may be you are not aware of history when the first NIR thought-process-documentation was made. The basic application itself is not complying the above three requirements "by members", "for member" and "to members", so it does not qualify my view. Greetings, Kusumba S
|