Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

[<myamanis@bb.softbank.co.jp>]

Dear All,

Sorry for late reply.

> I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.

Yes, I'm also comfortable for the text which was sent by Philip on last Sat.
and I would like to withdraw option-B.

Rgs,
Masato Yamanishi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net 
> [mailto:sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of 
> Seiichi Kawamura
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 6:24 PM
> To: sig-policy
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all
> 
> > How about the others who've commented in the last days? 
> Anybody else?
> 
> Yes, I'm comfortable with this change as well.
> - From the discussion on this list within the past few weeks,
> I would say that this will gain more support
> and I ask plan B be withdrawn from the table
> (if it hasn't been already)
> so we can finalize this proposal.
> 
> I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.
> 
> Regards,
> Seiichi
> 
> 
> Andy Linton wrote:
> > On 18/07/2009, at 22:35 , Philip Smith wrote:
> > 
> >> Agreed, we don't need reference to the EC for the reason you state,
> >> Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be 
> merged as:
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an 
> application for
> >> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. 
> The APNIC
> >> secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
> >> publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
> >> identifying any member organization, these statistics will 
> record the
> >> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the 
> requests  
> >> come
> >> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that 
> one request
> >> under these provisions.
> >> ----
> > 
> > 
> > Philip,
> > 
> > I'm comfortable with this change - I'm guessing Terry will 
> be as well.
> > 
> > How about the others who've commented in the last days? 
> Anybody else?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > andy
> > 
> > 
> > *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource 
> management policy           *
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-policy mailing list
> > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> > 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
> 
> iD8DBQFKZYk5crhTYfxyMkIRAn1DAJ9fnhI0rdxGon2MMLNealfbyouEzACdEg+k
> S3CLGPe7AAMeJs7UZD9BaiY=
> =ngla
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management 
> policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>