Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

[Terry Manderson <terry@terrym.net>]

On 16/07/2009, at 2:43 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:

> > Thanks for posting this data - I wonder if the result would have been
> > different if Option C had talked about 12 months instead of 24  
> > months.
>
> Interesting point. Didn't take a poll on that, but I don't see any
> reasons for our community objecting to the change from 24 months to 12
> months.
>
> Thanks for the comment!


So if I may, A reword of option C based on the comments from Andy and  
Izumi:

C ver 1.1 ;)

"When a member disposes of address space using this transfer policy
the member should not be entitled to any further IPv4 allocations
or assigments from APNIC for a period of 12 months or until the
"final / 8" assignment measures are implemented. In exceptional
circumstances a member can submit a comprehensive plan justifying
an allocation and a notice of application will be posted for at least
7 days on the APNIC website."

Terry