Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

[Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all

> How about the others who've commented in the last days? Anybody else?

Yes, I'm comfortable with this change as well.
- From the discussion on this list within the past few weeks,
I would say that this will gain more support
and I ask plan B be withdrawn from the table
(if it hasn't been already)
so we can finalize this proposal.

I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.

Regards,
Seiichi


Andy Linton wrote:
> On 18/07/2009, at 22:35 , Philip Smith wrote:
> 
>> Agreed, we don't need reference to the EC for the reason you state,
>> Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be merged as:
>>
>> ----
>> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
>> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. The APNIC
>> secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
>> publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
>> identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the
>> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requests  
>> come
>> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
>> under these provisions.
>> ----
> 
> 
> Philip,
> 
> I'm comfortable with this change - I'm guessing Terry will be as well.
> 
> How about the others who've commented in the last days? Anybody else?
> 
> Regards,
> andy
> 
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFKZYk5crhTYfxyMkIRAn1DAJ9fnhI0rdxGon2MMLNealfbyouEzACdEg+k
S3CLGPe7AAMeJs7UZD9BaiY=
=ngla
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----