Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

["Terence Zhang YH" <zhangyinghao@cnnic.cn>]

What's the final version on re-application time limit? 
Is that 12 months with exceptional handling or until the "final /8"　assignment measures are implemented? 

With exceptional handling in place, why don't we go with the oringinal proposed time limit of 24 months?

Regards

Terence Zhang
CNNIC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Seiichi Kawamura" <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
To: "sig-policy" <sig-policy@apnic.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all
> 
>> How about the others who've commented in the last days? Anybody else?
> 
> Yes, I'm comfortable with this change as well.
> - From the discussion on this list within the past few weeks,
> I would say that this will gain more support
> and I ask plan B be withdrawn from the table
> (if it hasn't been already)
> so we can finalize this proposal.
> 
> I don't think Masato-san will object to me saying so here.
> 
> Regards,
> Seiichi
> 
> 
> Andy Linton wrote:
>> On 18/07/2009, at 22:35 , Philip Smith wrote:
>> 
>>> Agreed, we don't need reference to the EC for the reason you state,
>>> Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be merged as:
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
>>> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. The APNIC
>>> secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
>>> publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
>>> identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the
>>> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requests  
>>> come
>>> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
>>> under these provisions.
>>> ----
>> 
>> 
>> Philip,
>> 
>> I'm comfortable with this change - I'm guessing Terry will be as well.
>> 
>> How about the others who've commented in the last days? Anybody else?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> andy
>> 
>> 
>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
> 
> iD8DBQFKZYk5crhTYfxyMkIRAn1DAJ9fnhI0rdxGon2MMLNealfbyouEzACdEg+k
> S3CLGPe7AAMeJs7UZD9BaiY=
> =ngla
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy