Hi Richard,
(2014/10/17 0:38), Richard Hill wrote:
Please see below.
Thanks and best,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: MAEMURA Akinori [mailto:maem@nic.ad.jp]
Sent: mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 19:42
To: gurcharya@gmail.com; rhill@hill-a.ch
Cc: mueller@syr.edu; IANAxfer@apnic.net
Subject: Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update
Dear Acharya,
| > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal
presented during
| > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the
| > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with
silence during the
| > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full
consensus.
Masato as the Moderator, at the last part of the session,
took good care to study the sentiment of the floor,
which doesn't appear on the script.
It was sufficient time to wait for any last minute objection,
and quite natural to be regarded as a consensus, in my sense.
"full consensus" sounds something hard, and might be not
the case for this, but it is my understanding that we have
obtained sufficient consensus for that simple proposal,
with which we can move it forward.
Does this mean that that proposal has been approved? What about the
comments that wre made on this mailing, in particular:
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/ianaxfer/archive/2014/09/msg00003.html
It doesn't mean the proposal was approved as the final version.
But I think it is enough to move forward for further consideration.
Your message referred above is appreciated as raised an important point.
Again, the discussion in Brisbane is in the early stage, I am happy we
were successful to get the support for the simple principle with which
we can go ahead, and many details are to be discussed.
As we don't have much time, we should expedite the discussion.