Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update
Please see below.
Thanks and best,
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MAEMURA Akinori [mailto:maem@nic.ad.jp]
> Sent: mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 19:42
> To: gurcharya@gmail.com; rhill@hill-a.ch
> Cc: mueller@syr.edu; IANAxfer@apnic.net
> Subject: Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update
>
>
> Dear Acharya,
>
> | > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal
> presented during
> | > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the
> | > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with
> silence during the
> | > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full consensus.
>
> Masato as the Moderator, at the last part of the session,
> took good care to study the sentiment of the floor,
> which doesn't appear on the script.
>
> It was sufficient time to wait for any last minute objection,
> and quite natural to be regarded as a consensus, in my sense.
>
> "full consensus" sounds something hard, and might be not
> the case for this, but it is my understanding that we have
> obtained sufficient consensus for that simple proposal,
> with which we can move it forward.
Does this mean that that proposal has been approved? What about the
comments that wre made on this mailing, in particular:
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/ianaxfer/archive/2014/09/msg00003.h
tml
>
>
> Akinori, APNIC Executive Council
>
>
>
> At Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:41:10 +0530
> In message
> <CAEEwkf4txy2txz1adNTy1EuXPXrZZE4t0vkzcG1AsHhs4HRQHA@mail.gmail.com>
> "Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update"
> "Guru Acharya <gurcharya@gmail.com>" wrote:
>
> |
> |
> | The proposal prepared by the APNIC secretariat is available here:
> |
> http://blog.apnic.net/2014/09/08/iana-session-apnic-38-a-discussio
> n-proposal/#iana
> |
> | Slide 13 is all of it! The rest of the details on the
> secretariat proposal
> | can be gathered from the APNIC-38 transcripts that I have posted above.
> |
> | It has been posted over over a month now.
> |
> | On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
> |
> | > Further, could somebody post to this list the "APNIC staff proposal"
> | > referred to below?
> | >
> | > Thanks and best,
> | > Richard
> | >
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > *From:* ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net
> [mailto:ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net]*On
> | > Behalf Of *Guru Acharya
> | > *Sent:* mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 18:45
> | > *To:* IANAxfer@apnic.net
> | > *Cc:* mueller@syr.edu
> | > *Subject:* [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update
> | >
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > This list (IANAxfer) created by APNIC to discuss the number
> community's
> | > response to the ICG RFP has been absolutely silent for almost
> a month. I am
> | > curious to know the current status of the process in the
> numbers community;
> | > and if an alternate medium/list is now being used to discuss
> the transition.
> | >
> | > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal
> presented during
> | > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the
> | > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with
> silence during the
> | > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full consensus.
> | >
> | >
> conference.apnic.net/data/38/20140917-1100-IANA-Stewardship-Transition.txt
> | >
> | > Further, how will the proposal be coordinated amongst the 5
> RIRs at the
> | > NRO level?
> | >
> | > Thanks,
> | > Acharya
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | IANAxfer mailing list
> | IANAxfer@apnic.net
> | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
> |
> |
> |
>