Hi Richard, (2014/10/17 0:38), Richard Hill wrote:
Please see below. Thanks and best, Richard-----Original Message----- From: MAEMURA Akinori [mailto:maem@nic.ad.jp] Sent: mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 19:42 To: gurcharya@gmail.com; rhill@hill-a.ch Cc: mueller@syr.edu; IANAxfer@apnic.net Subject: Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update Dear Acharya, | > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal presented during | > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the | > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with silence during the | > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full consensus. Masato as the Moderator, at the last part of the session, took good care to study the sentiment of the floor, which doesn't appear on the script. It was sufficient time to wait for any last minute objection, and quite natural to be regarded as a consensus, in my sense. "full consensus" sounds something hard, and might be not the case for this, but it is my understanding that we have obtained sufficient consensus for that simple proposal, with which we can move it forward.Does this mean that that proposal has been approved? What about the comments that wre made on this mailing, in particular: http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/ianaxfer/archive/2014/09/msg00003.html
It doesn't mean the proposal was approved as the final version. But I think it is enough to move forward for further consideration. Your message referred above is appreciated as raised an important point.Again, the discussion in Brisbane is in the early stage, I am happy we were successful to get the support for the simple principle with which we can go ahead, and many details are to be discussed.
As we don't have much time, we should expedite the discussion. Akinori
Akinori, APNIC Executive Council At Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:41:10 +0530 In message <CAEEwkf4txy2txz1adNTy1EuXPXrZZE4t0vkzcG1AsHhs4HRQHA@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update" "Guru Acharya <gurcharya@gmail.com>" wrote: | | | The proposal prepared by the APNIC secretariat is available here: | http://blog.apnic.net/2014/09/08/iana-session-apnic-38-a-discussio n-proposal/#iana | | Slide 13 is all of it! The rest of the details on the secretariat proposal | can be gathered from the APNIC-38 transcripts that I have posted above. | | It has been posted over over a month now. | | On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote: | | > Further, could somebody post to this list the "APNIC staff proposal" | > referred to below? | > | > Thanks and best, | > Richard | > | > -----Original Message----- | > *From:* ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net [mailto:ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net]*On | > Behalf Of *Guru Acharya | > *Sent:* mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 18:45 | > *To:* IANAxfer@apnic.net | > *Cc:* mueller@syr.edu | > *Subject:* [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update | > | > Hi, | > | > This list (IANAxfer) created by APNIC to discuss the number community's | > response to the ICG RFP has been absolutely silent for almost a month. I am | > curious to know the current status of the process in the numbers community; | > and if an alternate medium/list is now being used to discuss the transition. | > | > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal presented during | > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the | > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with silence during the | > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full consensus. | > | > conference.apnic.net/data/38/20140917-1100-IANA-Stewardship-Transition.txt | > | > Further, how will the proposal be coordinated amongst the 5 RIRs at the | > NRO level? | > | > Thanks, | > Acharya | > | > | | | | | _______________________________________________ | IANAxfer mailing list | IANAxfer@apnic.net | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer | | |_______________________________________________ IANAxfer mailing list IANAxfer@apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer