Masato and Acharya,
I appreciate Acharya's contribution to this list of your thought. How APNIC is governed is well described in Masato's message below, and Kenny Huang's reference in his message fully valid showing the basis of EC's thought. RIRs have been in the form of "open, bottom-up and inclusive process" which welcomes all possible stakeholders, rather than "multistakeholder process", and I believe it has been well supported to do APNIC's own business. Acharya's point was more in the balance for fairness in the governance, and I agree with Masato that apnic-talk is the much more appropriate for such discussions. Here I'd appreciate if the focus goes to the framework and principles. Your point is very valid, Acharya, that active discussion on the mailinglist is indispensible, especially because, we will not have in-person meeting any more by the deadline for us to submit a proposal. By the way, I still wonder, Acharya, whether you are within our region or not. Have I met you before? Akinori (2014/10/16 11:52), Masato Yamanishi wrote:
|