Guru, Firstly, I cannot copy and paste the transcript from some reason, let me refer videos of each session instead of copying the transcript. See inline my comment.
As I mentinoed in AMM, this draft proposal was accepted by APNIC community as starting point of further discussion, not the final proposal. Then we will continue the discussion on this list until Nov. (See around 29:00 in AMM session 3 video
We discussed it for 38.5mins (you can see it from 35:30 to 1:14:00 in the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg2Kp6SRhQQ ), so I cannot understand why you call it "met with silence". Rather, we, APNIC community, had active and health discussion, and as a moderator, I am confident we could reach to enough level of consensus in APNIC community. Also, when I asked community views about second principle in draft proposal, Dean said very useful comment, so you cannot call it silence in that meaning too. (See at 1:15:00 in same video) Certainly, I didn't ask the consensus by show of hands nor voting, but this proposal is NOT a policy proposal for our number resources, so we have multiple ways to ask community's view, and I am also sure that the way I asked the consensus is fully accepted in APNIC community. Regards, Masato Yamanishi
|