Dear Yamanishi San, All three solutions are
reflecting the concerns too. J I
paste one of three areas again and highlight/underline the same, for your
reference: We need an electoral
body-the existing system forces us to be a
Judge for our own cause.
I elaborate the same also for your convenience: If I am an EC
and also be responsible for conducting/deciding on the election issues/concerns
of the contestants, it isn’t appropriate. If u want me to elaborate further on
the origin of the concern, it is possible but that way we wud lose our
objective-“Existence”; much above all the petty concerns. We shall focus on the positive side of this debate-if u think,
there is no need of electoral body and the ECs shall be responsible for the
same, I am okay to drop this debate at this juncture itself. Regards and best wishes Naresh Ajwani From: 山西 正人(ネットワーク本部) [mailto:myamanis at bb.softbank dot co dot jp] Dear
Naresh, Belows
are not concerns, they are solutions. Nobody
can not judge whether proposed solution is appropreate or not without
understanding underlying concerns and issues. I
want to avoid such situation, and I believe you too. What
is your other concern in addition to NIR delay and
the ambiguity of requirements for scrutineers in by-law which
we have met in last AMM? Masato
|