Re: [apnic-talk] Elections
In message <95E34AF7583A48F58CC7961BCB083259 at in dot spectranet dot com>
"RE: [apnic-talk] Elections"
"Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain at spectranet dot in>" wrote:
| Dear Maemura San,
|
| A senior EC person gave a logic , while you were in the chair, that a
| person should not be present in counting as ballot identity would be known.
|
I've checked the scribe but still have no idea who and what
part you mentioned. Whom do you mean by "A senior EC person"?
| Ballot papers have no name, so how come the identity would be known.
|
| Hope you would give your response.
|
No answer to the question since I clearly had a conflict of
interest as a candidate on anything regarding the election
on Friday. It is not the question when the motion was made.
That why I asked Kuo Wei Wu for being tentative chair since
he is the only officeholder not expiring the term.
For me personally, I have no idea why we cannot leave the
vote-counting far independent friends like colleagues from
other RIRs. Anyway, such a procedure should be reinforced
not to leave any ambigious interpretation.
Cheers,
Akinori@ rather personally this time