RE: [apnic-talk] "IPv8"
IEEE, ACM, ITU-T
Pick one and submit. It seems to me you fear peer review of you idea. You
like to hid behind E-mail banter but do not want to do the work that every
other engineer goes through to get their ideas reviewed.
Bary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-apnic-talk at apnic dot net [mailto:owner-apnic-talk at apnic dot net]On
> Behalf Of Jim Fleming
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 1998 8:59 PM
> To: 'Fred Baker'
> Cc: apnic-talk at apnic dot net; laina at singnet dot com dot sg; 'Rahmat M.
> Samik-Ibrahim'
> Subject: RE: [apnic-talk] "IPv8"
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 12, 1998 4:02 AM, Barry Raveendran
> Greene[SMTP:bgreene at cisco dot com] wrote:
> <snip>
> @
> @Peer review is essential for good engineering. It's a core value
> of the IETF
> @process. All three IP registries also go through peer review internally
> @(members, BoDs, and advisors) and with each other. I still do
> not see why if
> @you feel IPv8 is the savior of the Internet that you refuse to
> document it
> @and publish it for peer review.
> @
>
> Yes...peer review is essential for good engineering...in order to do
> that you have to have good engineers as part of the process. In
> my opinion, that does not lead one to the IETF. The IETF is a
> group of politicians in my opinion. It is a group that dwells on the
> past and not the future. This is one of the reasons why significant
> Internet developments (like the HTML and the WWW) did NOT
> come from the IETF.
>
> Again...there are other groups besides the IETF...does APNIC
> ONLY deal with the IETF ? Why does the IETF have a monopoly
> on engineering ?
>
> -
> Jim Fleming
> Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
> IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
> AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM
>
> * APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
> * To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *
>
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *