RE: [apnic-talk] "IPv8"
On Tuesday, May 12, 1998 4:02 AM, Barry Raveendran Greene[SMTP:bgreene at cisco dot com] wrote:
<snip>
@
@Peer review is essential for good engineering. It's a core value of the IETF
@process. All three IP registries also go through peer review internally
@(members, BoDs, and advisors) and with each other. I still do not see why if
@you feel IPv8 is the savior of the Internet that you refuse to document it
@and publish it for peer review.
@
By the way...IPv8 is being documented...these e-mail exchanges
are part of the documentation...just like exchanges that could be
documented in IETF working groups...
I do not refuse to document it, I just refuse to document it in conjunction
with a group like the IETF. I also refuse to document it in concert with
the KKK and the NAZIS. That is my choice. The Internet is all about
choice. Why is it that people refuse to give people choice ?
In my opinion, if IPv8 comes about, it will come from the people. It
will come from the grass-roots. It will come from the sum total of
curious engineers who take the time to study it, add to it, and to
make it happen. That is the Internet way. That is not what the IETF
promotes.
Also...there is nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree. It appears
to me that APNIC is a very small group of people with a 100% IETF
and CISCO view of the world. That is fine. There are other groups in
the world. If IPv8 is worthwhile, those groups will find it or it will find
them no matter how much APNIC trys to censor the messages.
That is the Internet way...
-
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *