RE: [apnic-talk] "IPv8"
On Tuesday, May 12, 1998 4:02 AM, Barry Raveendran Greene[SMTP:bgreene at cisco dot com] wrote:
<snip>
@
@Peer review is essential for good engineering. It's a core value of the IETF
@process. All three IP registries also go through peer review internally
@(members, BoDs, and advisors) and with each other. I still do not see why if
@you feel IPv8 is the savior of the Internet that you refuse to document it
@and publish it for peer review.
@
Yes...peer review is essential for good engineering...in order to do
that you have to have good engineers as part of the process. In
my opinion, that does not lead one to the IETF. The IETF is a
group of politicians in my opinion. It is a group that dwells on the
past and not the future. This is one of the reasons why significant
Internet developments (like the HTML and the WWW) did NOT
come from the IETF.
Again...there are other groups besides the IETF...does APNIC
ONLY deal with the IETF ? Why does the IETF have a monopoly
on engineering ?
-
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *