Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

[Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve@eintellego.net>]

I really like the wording below.  Do we want to elaborate on exceptional circumstances? Probably not, but will it cause a burden on APNIC to be reviewing requests?  If there were some guidelines, maybe that might eliminate some of the workload.

...Skeeve

--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-
> bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Andy Linton
> Sent: Friday, 17 July 2009 4:11 PM
> To: sig-policy SIG
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
>
> I think we're close to something many of us can work with. Terry and I
> have been suggesting 12 months rather than 24 months and I had drafted
> words not unlike Geoff's but without the reference to the EC and with
> more detail on the stats which I was going to post. So can I suggest
> something like:
>
> ---
>
> When a member disposes of address space using this transfer policy the
> member should not be entitled to any further IPv4 allocations or
> assignments from APNIC for a period of 12 months or until the "final
> /8"
> assignment measures are implemented.
>
> Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
> further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. Any such
> application must be endorsed by the Executive Council or its delegate.
>
> The APNIC secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully
> and publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
> identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the
> numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requests come
> from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
> under these provisions.
>
> ---
>
> I think that this would allow the community to have some reassurance
> that the transfer system is not being abused.
>
> Note: I've deliberately left any mention of fees out of this as that's
> a
> task for the Executive Council.
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy