Re: [sig-policy] prop-055: Global policy for the allocation of the remai
FYI, I am planning to make informational presentation to start
discussions on this.
http://www.apnic.net/meetings/25/program/policy/okutani-end-policy.pdf
izumi
David Woodgate wrote:
> I agree with Philip that if there is no accompanying proposal
> describing how the final /8 should be managed by APNIC, then this
> proposal has no apparent benefit over just letting the pool run out
> through the existing procedures in place.
>
> I therefore also oppose the proposal as it stands.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Woodgate
>
> At 03:12 PM 13/02/2008, Philip Smith wrote:
>> Randy Bush said the following on 12/2/08 12:48:
>>> Continuing discussion
>>> ---------------------
>>>
>>> Here are some questions to help discussion continue:
>>>
>>> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>> Oppose.
>>
>> While the proposers have gone a long way to answering the many concerns
>> expressed, there is still no specific APNIC region proposal as to what
>> to do with the special remaining IPv4 addresses. So all this effort will
>> be wasted if the proposal is approved, as there are no safeguards.
>>
>> I'd rather see a proposal on what APNIC should be doing with the last /8
>> they get. I think that is what prop-56 intends, but it isn't explicitly
>> stated as such in this proposal, or on prop-56 for that matter.
>>
>> Maybe prop-55 and prop-56 authors can get together and sort out their
>> dependencies. With that, I may change from "oppose" to "no opinion". ;-)
>>
>> philip
>> --
>>
>>> - Can this proposal be implemented along with other proposals
>>> at APNIC or does its implementation mean that other proposals
>>> cannot be implemented?
>>>
>>> - Do you see any advantages in the proposal?
>>>
>>> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>>>
>>> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>>>
>>> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>>> effective?
>>>
>>>
>>> Full details of the proposal can be found at:
>>>
>>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-055-v001.html
>>>
>>> randy, for the policy sig {chair}
>>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>> policy *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management
>> policy *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy