Re: [sig-policy] prop-134: PDP Update withdrawn by author
Hi Bertrand, all,
As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is "temporary", in view of the commitment from the EC/secretariat to review the discrepancies in the actual PDP and SIG guidelines, assuming that this will be brought back to the community, following the bottom-up-approach, but the next meeting (maximum).
I still thing that this should not be a task done only by the EC/secretariat but instead a Taks Force should be setup. I hope the EC can still consider setting up this TF.
As a result of the EC review or TF review the community should be able to decide how to move on, including, if needed, new policy proposals.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 24/2/20 3:57, "Bertrand Cherrier" <sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net en nombre de b.cherrier@micrologic.nc> escribió:
Dear colleagues
Version 2 of prop-134: PDP Update, did not reach consensus and was
withdrawn by the author at the APNIC 49 Open Policy Meeting.
Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and
links to previous versions are available at:
https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-134/
We'd like to thank the author and everyone for taking the time to
discuss this proposal.
Regards
Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
Policy SIG Chairs
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.