Re: [sig-policy] apipol Thailand Re: sig-policy Digest, Vol 110, Issue 4
Hi Apipol,
Currently, I propose to distribute maximum /22 upon member's request
in the same manner as /8 policy.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki
From: Apipol Gunabhibal <ag100.ap at gmail dot com>
Subject: [sig-policy] apipol Thailand Re: sig-policy Digest, Vol 110, Issue 4
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:08:39 +0700
| Dear members
|
| Basically I strongly agree on this policy but I 'm not so clear about the
| amount of the resources being distributed to members. Is it the same as
| final /8 policy? If yes, it would be great, thanks
|
| Regards
| apipol
|
| On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:00 AM, <sig-policy-request at lists dot apnic dot net> wrote:
|
| > Send sig-policy mailing list submissions to
| > sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
| >
| > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
| > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
| > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
| > sig-policy-request at lists dot apnic dot net
| >
| > You can reach the person managing the list at
| > sig-policy-owner at lists dot apnic dot net
| >
| > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
| > than "Re: Contents of sig-policy digest..."
| >
| >
| > Today's Topics:
| >
| > 1. New version of prop-105: Distribution of returned IPv4
| > address blocks (Andy Linton)
| >
| >
| > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| >
| > Message: 1
| > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:35:35 +1200
| > From: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
| > To: SIG policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
| > Subject: [sig-policy] New version of prop-105: Distribution of
| > returned IPv4 address blocks
| > Message-ID:
| > <CALS-_OqjEsNmnbraRmwpM=
| > 3RLu1yanF1jpq3V+ZoG94U0QoB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
| > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
| >
| > Dear SIG members
| >
| > A new version of the proposal "prop-105-v002: Distribution of returned
| > IPv4 address blocks (Modification of prop-088)" has been sent to
| > the Policy SIG for review.
| >
| > Changes from the previous version are:
| >
| > - Added estimates of available APNIC pool size once "Global policy for
| > post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA" is activated.
| >
| > - Proposes timing and a mechanism for APNIC to make delegations from
| > this 'returned' pool.
| >
| > Information about this version and earlier versions is available from:
| >
| > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-105
| >
| >
| > You are encouraged you to express your views on the proposal:
| >
| > - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
| > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
| > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
| > effective?
| >
| > Regards,
| >
| > Andy, Skeeve, and Masato
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| >
| > prop-105-v002: Distribution of returned IPv4 address blocks
| > (Modification of prop-088)
| >
| > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| >
| > Authors: Tomohiro Fujisaki fujisaki at syce dot net
| >
| > JP IPv4 address allocation discussion team
| >
| >
| > 1. Introduction
| > ---------------
| >
| > After the final /8 policy is implemented, IPv4 address blocks received
| > by APNIC are handled as being part of the final /8 pool and to
| > redistribute these resources according to the final /8 policy
| > (prop-088). This policy proposes to define a separate distribution
| > policy for all non-103 IPv4 address blocks in the APNIC pool, to start
| > the distributions once "Global policy for post exhaustion IPv4
| > allocation mechanisms by the IANA" is activated.
| >
| >
| > 2. Summary
| > ----------
| >
| > While rapid implementation of IPv6 is in progress throughout the APNIC
| > region, demands for IPv4 address still continue.
| >
| > In May 2012, the global policy ?lobal Policy for Post Exhaustion: IPv4
| > Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA) was ratified by ICANN board, and it
| > will be implemented soon. Based on this policy, IPv4 address space
| > returned to IANA will be distributed to RIRs, and its size is not
| > expected to be so large but substantial enough to be able to consider an
| > additional minimum allocation for APNIC members.
| >
| > APNIC is expected to have 6,917,683 (over /10) IPv4 addresses in its
| > pool once the Global Policy is activated, as an re-allocation from IANA
| > and IPv4 address space directly returned to APNIC from its members.
| >
| > Currently, these address blocks will be added to the reserve for
| > distributions according to the final /8 policy, in addition to 103/8
| > block already reserved for the purpose. Therefore, even if additional
| > blocks are added in APNIC's pool while reserves remain in the 103/8
| > block range, it is reserved for distribution under the final /8 policy.
| > We propose to distribute this newly received address block and address
| > blocks returned to APNIC to APNIC account holders.
| >
| > According to our survey conducted to the APNIC community, over 70% of
| > the respondents expressed the needs to receive IPv4 address space,
| > if a separate distribution policy is defined from the final /8 policy.
| >
| >
| > 3. Situation in other RIRs
| > --------------------------
| >
| > ARIN: no final /8 like policy.
| >
| > RIPE-NCC: similar /8 policy.
| >
| >
| > 4. Details
| > ----------
| >
| > Modify prop-088 to distribute non-103 IPv4 address blocks to APNIC
| > account holders who meet the IPv4 distribution criteria define in APNIC
| > policies.
| >
| > If APNIC account holder, who was allocated an /22 from the final /8
| > pool, needs an additional IPv4 address block, they are eligible to
| > receive another distribution of IPv4 block.
| >
| > The same policy as the final /8 policy will be applied in terms of the
| > criteria and the size of the distribution given the requestor has
| > utilized a total of /22 block from 103/8.
| >
| > This policy will be effective after allocation of returned IPv4 address
| > blocks from IANA, based on "Global policy for post exhaustion IPv4
| > allocation mechanisms by the IANA".
| >
| > The distribution policy for 103/8 block will remain unchanged, based on
| > the final /8 policy.
| >
| > - Address size Consideration
| >
| > The current IPv4 Address size recovered by IANA from RIRs is
| > 18,204,416. If this is equally distribute to 5 RIRs, APNIC is expected
| > to receive 3,640,883 after the global policy is activated.
| >
| > APNIC also has a pool recovered directly from its account holders,
| > with the total of 50 x 16s (max)*. By adding them up, APNIC is
| > estimated to have 6,917,683 (over /10) IPv4 address after global
| > policy will be activated.
| >
| > * Address blocks in ERX range need some coordination to distribute.
| >
| > APNIC has about 3,800 members, and about 4,800 members if NIR members
| > is included. We can now distribute about 1,441 IPv4 address to all
| > 4,000 members, which is over /22.
| >
| > >From the current final /8 address distribution trends, it will allow
| > all LIRs who have received 103/22 to receive an additional /22 under
| > this policy from the above IPv4 address pool (6,917,683) until
| > 2017-2018.
| >
| >
| > - Subsequent IPv4 address re-allocated from IANA/returned to APNIC from
| > its account holders
| >
| > If there are subsequent IPv4 address as described above, such IPv4
| > address space will be pooled until:
| >
| > - Total IPv4 address size in APNIC pool will reach enough size which
| > can distribute the maximum distribution size at at time
| > (currently, /22 to a member) to all APNIC members.
| > - After the APNIC pool reaches the size sufficient to distribute to
| > all APNIC members at that point in time, additional IPv4 address
| > distribution will start from that pool.
| >
| > Reference
| > IANA pool size:
| > http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-implementing-ip
| > v4-post-17dec12-en.pdf
| >
| >
| >
| > 5. Pros/Cons
| > ------------
| >
| > Advantages: Able to utilize non-103/8 address pool in APNIC for
| > immediate distribution, instead of keeping as a reserve, in addition to
| > 103/8.
| >
| > Disadvantages: Some may feel the concern that adopting this policy
| > discourages IPv6 deployment in the APNIC region. However, according to
| > our survey, majority of the respondents responded revising the policy
| > does not impact their IPv6 deployment plan.
| >
| >
| >
| > 6. Effect on APNIC
| > ------------------
| >
| > APNIC account holders can obtain one more IPv4 block of minimum
| > allocation size as the upper limit (currently /22).
| >
| >
| >
| > 7. Effect on NIRs
| > -----------------
| >
| > NIRs can choose whether to implement this policy or not.
| >
| >
| > ------------------------------
| >
| > _______________________________________________
| > sig-policy mailing list
| > sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
| > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
| >
| >
| > End of sig-policy Digest, Vol 110, Issue 4
| > ******************************************
| >