Re: [sig-policy] Prop-098 Revision 2

To: owen at delong dot com
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-098 Revision 2
From: Ren-Hung Hwang <rhhwang at gmail dot com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:45:44 +0800
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear Owen,

I may lost trace of this proposal's discussion. Could you kindly explain how the

following numbers ( 99.9995% and 99.62%) are calculated.

Thank you very much,

Ren-Hung

Disadvantages:

- May increase IPv6 address allocation. Probable impact over 50
years would reduce IPv6 free pool from 99.9995% to 99.62%.

--
Ren-Hung Hwang
Research Distinguished Professor
Dept. of Computer Science & Information Engineering
National Chung Cheng Univ.
Chia-Yi, Taiwan, 621
http://exodus.cs.ccu.edu.tw/~rhhwang
WebOffice: http://mmc.elearning.ccu.edu.tw/home/rhhwang