Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
> different if Option C had talked about 12 months instead of 24 months.
Interesting point. Didn't take a poll on that, but I don't see any
reasons for our community objecting to the change from 24 months to 12
months.
Thanks for the comment!
Izumi
Andy Linton wrote:
> Izumi Okutani wrote:
>
>>> B: Any address that will be transfered must be held by the
>>> transfering party for at least 12 months, regardless of how the
>>> address was obtained.
>> C: Terry's suggestion
>>> When a member disposes of address space using this transfer policy
>>> the member should not be entitled to any further IPv4 allocations
>>> or assigments from APNIC for a period of 24 months or until the
>>> "final / 8" assignment measures are implemented. In exceptional
>>> circumstances a member can submit a comprehensive plan justifying
>>> an allocation. A substantial processing fee may be charged and a
>>> notice of application will be posted for at least 7 days on the
>>> APNIC website.
>
>
>> FYI, we've taken the vote counts to see preference of the community
>> and the results were:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Should Add some form of restrictions
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> yes : 13
> > no : 32
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> If there is to be a restriction, which option should be adopted?
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> option A (original prop-050) : 0
> > option B (seiichi's suggestion) : 20
> > option C (terry's suggestion) : 18
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for posting this data - I wonder if the result would have been
> different if Option C had talked about 12 months instead of 24 months.
>
> If we are to believe the IPv4 Exhaustion Counter at
> http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index_en.html we don't have 24 months
> to play with. That counter now estimates 703 days or ~= 23 months. Allow
> another 3 months to get this policy through if everyone agrees in
> Beijing and on the list and in the EC. Then allow another 1-2 months to
> get things up and working at APNIC and we've got more like 18 months and
> that includes the "final /8" period.
>
> So lets discuss Option C with a much shorter restriction that 24 months
> please. I'd suggest 12 months at most.
>
> I'd also be tempted to leave out mention of fees in this option - that's
> the job of the EC - not this group.
>
> andy
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy