Re: [sig-policy] Requests from routing/packeting concerns
> 1. To have a system that allows a third party to confirm
> "authenticity" of address space. (prove you are the right holder)
> A third party may mean an upsteam ISP, or to get internal approval
> by non-tech people within an organization to obtain IPv4 resource.
>
> Resource Certificate may provide an answer to the first needs, but
> may be more studies are required for proving it to non-tech
> people.
the description of the transfer process using the rpki may be found at
<http://archive.psg.com/071208.transfer.pdf>. it tried to be simple.
> 2.Information from APNIC to help confirm the "cleaness" of address
> Records on the past holders of the address space (not only the
> previous, but all past holders by date) would help at the time of
> obtaining the resource/trouble shooting for transfered space.
> The public log defined in prop-050 is probably quite good overall to
> but hope we can review more on other information which may be
> required.
by cleanness, i suspect you mostly mean "if i route this, will the
announcement propagate and be generally accepted." this can actually be
tested empirically. see a public preso (papers in progress) of the work
at <http://archive.psg.com/070604.nanog-bogons.pdf>.
randy