Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPRO
Thank you Ann for your clarification as far as it is a clarification that is..
Indeed this was not a vote. As such there is no consensus as without
a means of measuring, consensus cannot be determined. But we
have been here before haven't we Ann?
Anne Lord wrote:
> Chanki
>
> >
> > So my expectation was "A tie" or "can not decide" instead of
> > "no consensus".
> > (This is the reason I call the chair's decision A MISTAKE)
> >
>
> One important clarification. This is not a vote. Therefore a "tie" or
> "cannot decide" does not exist in the policy development process.
> Both are states that indicate that there is no general consensus.
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> Anne
> --
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827