Re: [sig-policy]Proposal to lower the minimum allocation size
> --> may lead to networks which can meet their needs with portable
> assignments requesting portable allocations.
> e.g) lowering the criteria to "use /24 immediately" would make
> a substantial number of enduser networks eligible to
> receive allocations
> --> a suggestion was made to add/replace with a multi-homing
> criteria if lowering the size
>
> - needs a clarification in the portable assignment policy
> --> losening the allocation criteria makes the distinction between
> portable assignments and LIR direct allocations vague
thank you, thank you, thank you. and my routers than you.
i was thinking of proposing ipv4 allocations at /32, so the
system would become entirely fair and there would be no
barriers to entry. but satire does not come across well in
a multi-cultural environment.
there is a delicate balance.
randy