Re: [sig-policy]Revised APNIC Policy Process - Proposal
> Anne and all,
>
> Your welcome, and yes it would. >:)
>
> Anne Lord wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. It would be good to know if other people reading
> > this list feel the same way?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Anne
Rough consensus is exactly that, rough. It is easy to gauge whether
or not a group of participants are still in violent disagreement, passively
reading email or empassionately supportive of an idea. I'm not so
certain that a count is required to make that assessment.
-ron
PS: slight delay in the response was due to..uh..um...trans-pacific
carrier pigeons needing to stop and refuel.. ;-)