Maemura san and all, > I think Toshi will present JPNIC's original idea for a long- > term solution, which was introduced in wg-nir-fee before, > in the presentation of JPNIC Update, then I will be happy > if you allow to have some time for Paul to introduce that.I have attached ppt file which I was going to present in the NIR SIG, for your information. I'd like APNIC secretariat to upload this onto the APNIC20 website as well.
In the slide there are some rough ideas for a new NIR fee structure. I'd appreciate if you, each NIR, make some simulation and give us a feedback or comments on this.
Of couse if you have questions please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks and best regards, Toshi/JPNIC -------- Original Message -------- From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem at maem dot org> To: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net Subject: [sig-nir] Discussion about long-term NIR fee reballancing Date: 2005/9/6 17:58
Colleagues,The Executive Council had its meeting today and there was disccussed about a long-term solution for NIR fee.We need this discussion independently from our current discussion of abolishing/discounting IPv6 per address fee.Please note long-term one will not influence short-term one. I'd like Paul to briefly introduce this long-term solutionin this coming NIR-SIG.I think Toshi will present JPNIC's original idea for a long-term solution, which was introduced in wg-nir-fee before, in the presentation of JPNIC Update, then I will be happy if you allow to have some time for Paul to introduce that.Izumi, please take it into account this additional agenda, if there is no objection. Regards, MAEMURA Akinori for the Executive Council _______________________________________________ sig-nir mailing list sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
Attachment:
NIR_FEE_JPNIC.ppt
Description: MS-Powerpoint presentation