[sig-nir] Discussion about long-term NIR fee reballancing

To: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: [sig-nir] Discussion about long-term NIR fee reballancing
From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem at maem dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:58:54 +0900
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>


The Executive Council had its meeting today and there was 
disccussed about a long-term solution for NIR fee.

We need this discussion independently from our current 
discussion of abolishing/discounting IPv6 per address fee.

Please note long-term one will not influence short-term one.

I'd like Paul to briefly introduce this long-term solution
in this coming NIR-SIG.  

I think Toshi will present JPNIC's original idea for a long-
term solution, which was introduced in wg-nir-fee before, 
in the presentation of JPNIC Update, then I will be happy 
if you allow to have some time for Paul to introduce that.


Izumi,  please take it into account this additional agenda,
if there is no objection.


Regards,
MAEMURA Akinori for the Executive Council