Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee
Thank you. Yes I am calling for the participants for this WG
>from all NIRs.
Again, this is to be closed only because we want to work on
very detailed figures to develop some models, and will get it
back in open discussion.
Regards,
Akinori
In message <4163B5F9.6000405 at twnic dot net dot tw>
"Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee"
"David Chen <david at twnic dot net dot tw>" wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| Thanks MAEMURA for your well consideration. For the suggestion, I
| support to form a closed WG, and the WG is comprised all NIRs and APNIC.
| Should NIRs nominate the participants?
|
| Best Regards,
|
| David Chen
|
|
| MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
|
| >NIR Colleagues,
| >
| >Regarding the NIR Fee, JPNIC IP Department has just had a
| >brief discussion.
| >
| >One of the way to look for a reasonable fee schedule is
| >raising some example schedules and/or models and then
| >applying current facts to verify if it is reasonable.
| >
| >We notice that for verification we need all figures from
| >per address fee amount, number of members and total address
| >space of all NIRs'. but they are of course not disclosed.
| >
| >
| >I think in this case we should form a *closed* working group
| >which contains all NIRs and APNIC Secretariat to share such
| >closed data.
| >
| >
| >If you agree on this idea;
| >
| >
| >APNIC Secretariat,
| > could you prepare a mailing list for this WG?
| >
| >NIR Colleagues,
| > please advise who will join this discussion
| >
| >
| >If you don't agree please let us have your comment and idea.
| >
| >
| >Best Regards,
| >Akinori
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >_______________________________________________
| >sig-nir mailing list
| >sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
| >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
| >
| >
| >
| _______________________________________________
| sig-nir mailing list
| sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
| http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir