Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee
Let me add some words to my idea.
I don't plan to have whole discussion closed and hidden but
on the contrary I'd like to have them as open as possible
and as far as reasonable.
I was advised of a negative perspective on the word *closed*
that I used in the previous message. I understand such a
perspective and realised that NIR team should keep the
closed discussion as short as possible - for example just to
make some models looking at detailed fee figures, then
disclose it to this list which is open to public.
so the working group would be
1) to be closed within NIRs and APNIC Secretariat
2) to share the fee and address size figure among us
3) to try some models to see if one is reasonable
4) to open the result as soon as we try till 3)
5) Should conclude after open discussion
I thinks APNIC Secretariat will work for keeping the closed
discussion reasonable for whole membership.
EC and non-NIR colleagues please advise me if you have
any suggestion to keep this agenda confortable to whole
membership.
Regards,
MAEMURA Akinori, on behalf of one of NIR
In message <01b401c4ab70$551d0ab0$8fd0ffcb@LocalHost>
"Re: [sig-nir] Forming WG to discuss about NIR Fee"
""ywju" <ywju at nic dot or dot kr>" wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| To begin with, Thank Maemura for your good suggestion.
| About Maemura's suggestion, my opinion is as belows.
|
|
| > NIR Colleagues,
| >
| > Regarding the NIR Fee, JPNIC IP Department has just had a
| > brief discussion.
| >
| > One of the way to look for a reasonable fee schedule is
| > raising some example schedules and/or models and then
| > applying current facts to verify if it is reasonable.
|
| Yes, sure.
|
| > We notice that for verification we need all figures from
| > per address fee amount, number of members and total address
| > space of all NIRs'. but they are of course not disclosed.
|
| I agree with this.And as I think, we need the information on budget status
| of each NIR.
| That is to say, we should consider NIR's operation cost of each NIR
| in order to check how much APNIC fee affect NIR's financial status under
| their own economic situation.
|
| > I think in this case we should form a *closed* working group
| > which contains all NIRs and APNIC Secretariat to share such
| > closed data.
|
| In this context, I also have the same idea with JPNIC. We should form
| WG which will be participated from all NIRs & APNIC.
|
| I also expect another good ideas from other NIRs.
|
| Sincerely yours,
|
| Yong Wan Ju
|
| _______________________________________________
| sig-nir mailing list
| sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
| http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir