[IANAxfer@apnic] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP Team Statement about the CCWG timeline
FYI.
I welcome comments on the global ianaxfer list <ianaxfer@nro.net>, if you have any concerns.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP Team Statement about the CCWG timeline
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:00:02 +0900
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>
To: ianaxfer@nro.net <ianaxfer@nro.net>
Dear Colleagues,
There are discussions in the CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability whether to extending its timeline.
While it is not in the charter of the CRISP Team to comment on the ICANN Accountability related issues, the timeline of the CCWG to submit its proposal to the NTIA affects the IANA Stewardship transition process, since the two proposals are requested to be submitted to the NTIA at the same time.
This is a draft of a statement from the CRISP Team which we plan to share with the CCWG. We do not intend to go into the details of the CCWG proposal, as this is not within the scope of our activity.
If you observe :
- Any point which you see as not consistent with the number community position, and/or
- Any concerns about the CRISP Team making such statement on the CCWG timeline
please express it on this mailing list before :Monday 21st Dec UTC23:59.
---
Dear CCWG,
The CRISP Team would like to express our comment on the discussions on the CCWG regarding the timelines, in incorporating comment from the ICANN Board:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-December/008860.html
As it has been well stated by some CCWG members, the CCWG timeline does not only affect the names community but has wider implications to the IANA Stewardship transition process and its timelines.
The CRISP Team would like to emphasise our strong concerns on extension of the CCWG timeline if it will compromise the NTIA timelines on the IANA stewardship transition.
We support the feedback of the ASO discussions, shared on the CCWG list, as a helpful way forward : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-December/008924.html
We thank the CCWG in considering the timelines with acknowledgement of the needs of the other operational communities.
We observe tremendous efforts have been made by the CCWG in addressing the challenges which arise through the process and finding a way forward, without affecting the transition timelines.
Now that is is very close to the end of the process in finalising its proposal, we trust the CCWG complete its work, maintaining to keep in line with overall the transition timelines.
Best Regards,
Izumi Okutani
on behalf of the CRISP Team
---
Izumi Okutani
_______________________________________________
ianaxfer mailing list
ianaxfer@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer