[IANAxfer@apnic] Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP Team Statement about the CCWG timeline
FYI.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] CRISP Team Statement about the CCWG timeline
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:54:11 +0900
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>
To: Bijal Sanghani <bijal@euro-ix.net>
CC: ianaxfer@nro.net <ianaxfer@nro.net>
Thank you Bijal for your supportive comment. It's always encouraging to see an explicit support from our community member.
The CRISP comment is posted on the CCWG list.
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-December/009047.html
Thank you all and happy holidays season!
Izumi
On 2015/12/21 21:42, Bijal Sanghani wrote:
> Dear Izumi, CRISP team,
>
>> On 19 Dec 2015, at 00:00, Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> There are discussions in the CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability whether to extending its timeline.
>>
>> While it is not in the charter of the CRISP Team to comment on the ICANN Accountability related issues, the timeline of the CCWG to submit its proposal to the NTIA affects the IANA Stewardship transition process, since the two proposals are requested to be submitted to the NTIA at the same time.
>>
>> This is a draft of a statement from the CRISP Team which we plan to share with the CCWG. We do not intend to go into the details of the CCWG proposal, as this is not within the scope of our activity.
>>
>> If you observe :
>>
>> - Any point which you see as not consistent with the number community position, and/or
>> - Any concerns about the CRISP Team making such statement on the CCWG timeline
>>
>> please express it on this mailing list before :Monday 21st Dec UTC23:59.
>
> I support the statement, thanks again for your work.
>
> best regards,
>
> Bijal
>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Dear CCWG,
>>
>>
>> The CRISP Team would like to express our comment on the discussions on the CCWG regarding the timelines, in incorporating comment from the ICANN Board:
>>
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-December/008860.html
>>
>> As it has been well stated by some CCWG members, the CCWG timeline does not only affect the names community but has wider implications to the IANA Stewardship transition process and its timelines.
>>
>> The CRISP Team would like to emphasise our strong concerns on extension of the CCWG timeline if it will compromise the NTIA timelines on the IANA stewardship transition.
>>
>> We support the feedback of the ASO discussions, shared on the CCWG list, as a helpful way forward : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-December/008924.html
>>
>> We thank the CCWG in considering the timelines with acknowledgement of the needs of the other operational communities.
>>
>> We observe tremendous efforts have been made by the CCWG in addressing the challenges which arise through the process and finding a way forward, without affecting the transition timelines.
>> Now that is is very close to the end of the process in finalising its proposal, we trust the CCWG complete its work, maintaining to keep in line with overall the transition timelines.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Izumi Okutani
>> on behalf of the CRISP Team
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Izumi Okutani
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer@nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>