Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress
While I'm very appreciated for your and InternetNZ's effort,
can you speak it up to all community members, not only to me?
(or to EC and/or DG in specific case)
As Skeeve pointed out, I'm just a delegate from one of APNIC members in
here.
(BTW, I suggest you no dancing here also:-) )
Rgs,
Masato Yamanishi
On 14/03/24 20:35, "Dean Pemberton" <dean at internetnz dot net dot nz> wrote:
>Yamanishi-san,
>
>I think one of the most important things here is to get the important
>information out to the community, encourage people to become
>knowledgable about the issues, and contribute to them where they feel
>appropriate.
>
>To that end InternetNZ group staff have prepared a short paper to help
>inform people about the debate regarding the transition of the United
>States Government's DNS responsibilities to the global
>multistakeholder community.
>
>The paper explores the nature of what exactly is being transitioned,
>and then analyses the actual DNS functions at the global level,
>locates these in current institutional configurations, and then sets
>out a few options for alternative arrangements.
>
>None of these are necessarily an InternetNZ preferred model. Our
>purpose in publishing this paper is to help the discussion happen, and
>to show there are many possible ways to organise the DNS settlement
>after the USG exits from its current role.
>
>I am posting the information here in the hope that APNIC members find
>it a useful resource with which to start providing feedback to ICANN
>on this topic.
>
>https://internetnz.net.nz/system/files/pages/2014/2014-03-icann-iana-role-
>structures.pdf
>
>
>Regards
>Dean Pemberton
>
>Technical Policy Advisor
>InternetNZ
>+64 21 920 363 (mob)
>dean at internetnz dot net dot nz
>
>To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.