Lets focus on the issues here. I know some of us are not in the
position to attend apnic meetings. We are not lucky as people from developed countries.
We can only say on this email. how many of you agree to these? say it on this talk.
1. One member One Vote.
2. Limited period for ECs. Maximum 2 terms.
3. Independent election panel.
4. Minimum regional EC representation. Permanent reservation of 1 0r 2 seats
for each sub region.
5. Online only voting process, accessible only to the independent election panel.
6. Director general for maximum 5 year only.
7. Top management equal representation among sub regions. so they have
knowledge of our issues.
8. Decrease apnic expenses and decrease member fee.
9. Top management salaries and calss of travel discuss at apnci meeting.
10. Minimum one sub regional meeting per year.
We do not need anyone to make a policy. Current EC is represnting our membership.
they must note our discuss and make changes.
Regards
SB
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:16:29 +0530 wrote
>
MMC,
You stand right!
Simple terms -
1) Anything and everything at APNIC can be changed by a policy.
2) If balanced representation is a problem, propose a policy and
seek voting... everything will then fall "in".
Honestly, it is not fair to accuse or comment on anyone with or
without evidence in a mailing list, while laid down procedures
provision such actions anycase.
(Off the record - Infact, one not going thru the laid by-laws or
provisions is more regretting than one complying and still getting
accused!)
Greetings,
Kusumba S
On 11-07-2010 14:01, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
On 11/07/2010, at 3:53 PM, Sameer Bhagwat wrote:
Assalam-u-alaikum Aftab,
Good question but is Asia and Europe or America region same. Do they all have same problems? If yes, then why we need 4 rirs? all regions can have only one registry.
Why does any country need an NIR then?
Aftab, we have our own problems here and we together have responsibility to address them. One can only compare if one is equal to the other in all aspects.
As I pointed out in a previous post, the budget and expenditure ratios look pretty much the same between APNIC, RIPE and ARIN. If you want more APNIC money to go toward IPV6 training etc, then maybe raise it as a policy?
The problem APNIC appears to have is a group of people who, for internal political reasons want to take control of APNIC and seem to have no moral issues with blaming everyone else and calling everyone else corrupt and incompetent without evidence and with complete disrespect to people on the EC and the DG.
MMC
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk