MMC, You stand right! Simple terms - 1) Anything and everything at APNIC can be changed by a policy. 2) If balanced representation is a problem, propose a policy and seek voting... everything will then fall "in". Honestly, it is not fair to accuse or comment on anyone with or without evidence in a mailing list, while laid down procedures provision such actions anycase. (Off the record - Infact, one not going thru the laid by-laws or provisions is more regretting than one complying and still getting accused!) Greetings, Kusumba S On 11-07-2010 14:01, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote: On 11/07/2010, at 3:53 PM, Sameer Bhagwat wrote:Assalam-u-alaikum Aftab, Good question but is Asia and Europe or America region same. Do they all have same problems? If yes, then why we need 4 rirs? all regions can have only one registry.Why does any country need an NIR then?Aftab, we have our own problems here and we together have responsibility to address them. One can only compare if one is equal to the other in all aspects.As I pointed out in a previous post, the budget and expenditure ratios look pretty much the same between APNIC, RIPE and ARIN. If you want more APNIC money to go toward IPV6 training etc, then maybe raise it as a policy? The problem APNIC appears to have is a group of people who, for internal political reasons want to take control of APNIC and seem to have no moral issues with blaming everyone else and calling everyone else corrupt and incompetent without evidence and with complete disrespect to people on the EC and the DG. MMC _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
|