Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

[Andy Linton <asjl@lpnz.org>]

On 17/07/2009, at 24:17 , <myamanis@bb.softbank.co.jp> <myamanis@bb.softbank.co.jp 
> wrote:

> Dear Geoff, Terry and all,
>
> Even though I'm one of option-B's proposers, Option C is also  
> basically acceptable for me.
> So, let me clarify details of Option C.
>
> > "a notice of application will be posted for at least 7 days on the
> > APNIC website"
>
> I also have some concerns for this point.
> As Geoff already mentioned, it conflicts with current policy for  
> confidentiality between APNIC and members,
> and the effect is not so clear.

I am comfortable if this isn't in the proposal because of the  
confidentiality problem and also because I trust the APNIC and other  
hostmasters to do the right thing if/when these applications are lodged.

I expect that statistics of the number of these applications will be  
made available (with confidentiality preserved) and that the  
hostmaster staff would alert senior management, the EC and this group  
if major abuse appeared to be happening. If Terry is willing to modify  
his proposal it starts to look as if we have something that many of us  
can agree on.

andy