[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
Hi Andy,
On 19/06/2009, at 8:20 AM, Andy Linton wrote:
On 17/06/2009, at 19:44 , Terry Manderson wrote:
[..]
This doesn't stop any _needed_ allocations from happening post
transfer (ie not inhibiting business), and further highlights who is
doing what and why so gives more transparency to the process.
I've posted a reponse to Geoff's original request. I think that a
policy that empowers APNIC staff to implement something that looks
after this on our behalf is a better option. It achieves the same
result - the resource is allocated when _needed_.
I think we are both looking for similar things. I'd like higher levels
of
transparency to be incorporated here.
May I suggest an extension/alteration to your wording?
When a member disposes of address space using this transfer policy the
member should not be entitled to any further IPv4 allocations or
assigments from APNIC for a period of 24 months or until the "final /
8" assignment measures are implemented. In exceptional circumstances a
member can submit a comprehensive plan justifying an allocation. A
substantial processing fee may be charged and a notice of application
will
be posted for at least 7 days on the APNIC website.
Terry
