|
|
Hi Randy,
certainly. but what his message very clearly said was that he was speaking for the ripe address policy wg.
Yes, that part of the message was (unintentionally) badly worded.
As co-chair of the RIPE Address Policy Working Group I would like to express our concern about prop-050.
You were right when you asked me if this was an official statement of a RIPE working group: it was not. I should have made it clear that we were not sending this message as a result of discussion in our working group, but as a result of a discussion between the working group chairs. Sorry for that.
- Sander