[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE

To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:40:24 +0900
Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Delivered-to: sig-policy@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <8CBBB51E-9D25-4FED-B966-5DF280070303@steffann.nl>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8CBBB51E-9D25-4FED-B966-5DF280070303@steffann.nl>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> As co-chair of the RIPE Address Policy Working Group I would like to  
> express our concern about prop-050.

this is an official statement of the ripe address policy wg?  this was
discussed on the wg's mailing list and consensus was reached?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
  - From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>

References:
- [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
  - From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>

Prev by Date: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
Previous by thread: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread