[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004

To: James Spenceley <james@iroute.org>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:05:02 -0700
Cc: Matt RobbMarkham <matt@ams.co.nz>, sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Delivered-to: sig-policy@clove.apnic.net
In-reply-to: <C70F4922-E992-4EC3-9762-4825B8550BAE@iroute.org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.17.1236564004.27010.sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> <74AA9D8C683A2542B20DD5DB15FBF16B010008FA@ams-ad1.lan.ams.co.nz> <292AF25E62B8894C921B893B53A19D97394469DD9F@BUSINESSEX.business.ad> <C70F4922-E992-4EC3-9762-4825B8550BAE@iroute.org>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> There seems to be enough opposition to this policy to consider that it  
> doesn't have unanimous support *as is written*.

and i thought that was my job.

randy

References:
- [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
  - From: "Matt RobbMarkham" <matt@ams.co.nz>
- Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
  - From: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve@eintellego.net>
- Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
  - From: James Spenceley <james@iroute.org>

Prev by Date: [sig-policy] prop-072: Reapplication limits when transferring address space
Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] prop-072: Reapplication limits when transferring address space
Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread