|
|
So to summarize the situation:There seems to be enough opposition to this policy to consider that it doesn't have unanimous support *as is written*.
Most people (myself included) have agree that if the policy is combined with a subsequent discussion on the major issues, this would remove any opposition/issues with the proposal itself and the rather "odd" method of its birth and subsequent consensus.
On that basis, is everyone happy to agree the current policy has the consensus of the community *subject* to policies addressing the major issues being discussed at APNIC 28, with the combined result becoming the APNIC transfer policy ?
As far as I can tell the major issues are; Issues (currently being proposal being written) - Justification of transfered resources by "Gaining" member - Wait period before "Loosing" member can request more resources Optional Issues (raised, but not proposed directly as being written)- Resources transfered to a member are not again eligible for transfer within 24 month
- Initial resources only become eligible for transfer after 24 months -- James On 09/03/2009, at 2:12 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I don't subscribe to the 'a bad policy is better than no policy' philosophy.It is easier to fix this now, which I believe Phil is drafting something at the moment, than passing something that could cause mess....Skeeve -- Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists skeeve@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve -- NOC, NOC, who's there?Disclaimer: Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or legally privileged information. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. eintellego Pty Ltd and each legal entity in the Tefilah Pty Ltd group of companies reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of any such entity. Any reference to costs, fee quotations, contractual transactions and variations to contract terms is subject to separate confirmation in writing signed by an authorised representative of eintellego. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard inbound and outbound e-mails, we cannot guarantee that attachments are virus-free or compatible with your systems and do not accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced.* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *-----Original Message----- From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy- bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Matt RobbMarkham Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 1:21 PM To: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net Subject: [sig-policy] proposal prop-050-v004Hi all, I agree with Andy Linton that the proposal prop-050-v004 shouldgo ahead as agreed at APNIC27.I don't think anyone thinks that this is a perfect policy but I believeit is better than not having a policy to deal with address transfers.As other members have noted there are questions that remain unansweredwith this policy but Philip has already started a process to address some of these shortcomings. We are all free to do the same, to create complimentary proposals that aid this one. I don't think this policyshould be abandoned due only to some potential abuse of it by members,given that the host masters have existing policy to address this. I support this policy even if it is not totally polished. Regards Matt RobbMarkham Network Engineer Advanced Management Systems Ltd +649 9176528 matt@ams.co.nz Attention: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use, disclose, copyor distribute it, other than to return it to us with your confirmationthat it has been deleted from your system. * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy_______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy