Re: [sig-policy] Inter-registry transfers

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>]

Hi Terry,

On 16/02/2009 11:07, "Terry Manderson" <terry@terrym.net> wrote:

[...]

> Either way, the issue about reverse DNS is also germane. As it is with
> prop-69 what are the onging management and implications of the various
> transfer scenarios? Knowing that DNS delegation are strictly
> hierarchical.
> 
> just off the top of my head:
> 
> o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an APNIC member
> o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an ARIN member
> o a /24 from an ARIN member transfered to a KRNIC member
> .. and so on.
> 
> what should the membership expect, what are the buyer's and seller's
> responsibilities?

If the seller is selling just a part of their space and the DNS delegation
has to come from them, shouldn't this be covered in the contract between
them and the buyer?

> and dare I ask - is it at all important?

If it is important, maybe APNIC or someone else could publish sample text
for buyers and seller to include in their contracts?

Regards,

Leo Vegoda