|
|
On 17/02/2009, at 2:51 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
Hi Randy and all, I did notice a few people claiming we should go one step at a time, first start with APNIC region then extend to other RIRs.There is a routing operators who expressed concerns about the impact on routing to allow cross-RIR transfers at this stage, like as the question about the size i mentioned earlier, impact on region-based filtering, etc.Anyways, most people supported the concept of inter-RIR, either we do itin one go/take two steps.
Either way, the issue about reverse DNS is also germane. As it is with prop-69 what are the onging management and implications of the various transfer scenarios? Knowing that DNS delegation are strictly hierarchical.
just off the top of my head: o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an APNIC member o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an ARIN member o a /24 from an ARIN member transfered to a KRNIC member .. and so on.what should the membership expect, what are the buyer's and seller's responsibilities?
and dare I ask - is it at all important? Cheers Terry