[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-policy] Requests from routing/packeting concerns
These were major requests from routing/packeting concerns.
1. To have a system that allows a third party to confirm
"authenticity" of address space. (prove you are the right holder)
A third party may mean an upsteam ISP, or to get internal approval
by non-tech people within an organization to obtain IPv4 resource
Resource Certificate may provide an answer to the first needs, but
may be more studies are required for proving it to non-tech people.
2.Information from APNIC to help confirm the "cleaness" of address
Records on the past holders of the address space (not only the
previous, but all past holders by date) would help at the time of
obtaining the resource/trouble shooting for transfered space.
The public log defined in prop-050 is probably quite good overall to
but hope we can review more on other information which may be
required.
They may sound more like operational details rather than policies, but
operators here feel it's quite important that we have them ready before
implmenting this policy for the transfer policy to be work in real life.
i'll stop here for today...but I'll have to spam some more tomorrow :-P
