Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments - prop-053: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /22

[Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka@nic.ad.jp>]

Dear Alastair, and David,

Thank you for your comment. The Secretariat has contacted the author of the 
proposal to confirm the revised wording of the consensus version of 
proposal. We should have the revised version posted to the list within the 
next day or so. In the meantime, please feel free to provide feedback on the 
consensus element of version two of the proposal:

    It is proposed that the minimum IPv4 allocation size be changed
    from /21 to /22.

thanks
toshi
---
Toshiyuki Hosaka


Alastair Johnson wrote (2008/03/04 15:22):
> David Woodgate wrote:
> > As a point of order, shouldn't the final call be made on a new 
> > version of the text that eliminates the references to fees and 
> > membership tiers, to reflect the changes made at the SIG meeting?
> >
> > I don't think a final call should be made on a version of the 
> > document that is known to be different from the agreed proposal.
>
> I agree with David.  The proposal needs to be updated to reflect the 
> outcome of the discussion last week.
>
> aj
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy