Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments - prop-053: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /22

[David Woodgate <David.Woodgate@telstra.net>]

As a point of order, shouldn't the final call be made on a new 
version of the text that eliminates the references to fees and 
membership tiers, to reflect the changes made at the SIG meeting?

I don't think a final call should be made on a version of the 
document that is known to be different from the agreed proposal.

Regards,

                                                David Woodgate

At 03:57 PM 4/03/2008, Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> prop-053: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /22
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dear colleagues
>
> This is the final call for comments on policy proposal prop-053,
> 'Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /22'.
>
> Version two of this proposal was presented at APNIC 25. Part one of the
> proposal which was related to the size of minimum allocation was accepted by
> consensus. Consensus was not sought on part two of the proposal as it was
> related to fees.
>
> The proposal is now submitted to the Policy SIG mailing list for an
> eight-week discussion period. At the end of that period, if consensus
> appears to have been achieved, the Chair of the Policy SIG will
> ask the Executive Council to endorse the proposal for implementation.
>
> *   Send all comments and questions to:   <sig-policy@apnic.net>
> *   Deadline for comments:                29 April 2008
>
>
> Proposal details
> ----------------
>
> This is a proposal to change the minimum IPv4 allocation size from
> /21 to /22.
>
>
> Proposal details including the full text of the proposal,
> presentations, links to relevant meeting archives and links to mailing
> list discussions are available at:
>
>      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-053-v002.html
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management 
> policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy