Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001

[Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com>]

Chanki Park said the following on 6/12/05 15:02:
> <snip>
> 
>>Likewise, please explain to us how 4 supporters out of 1000 members is
>>"general consensus"?
>
> You are exactly pointing out the same thing I pointed out.

No I am most definitely not...

You are trying to claim that 4 people objecting to and 4 people
supporting a proposal out of approx 1000 means that there is general
consensus. I hope I don't have to be subjected to any of the meetings
you chair where you have to call consensus!

May I suggest you look up what consensus means. I posted the definition
in a previous e-mail, go look it up (hint: 25th November at 12:51 AEST).

Maybe you'd like votes?

Now, please go back and read my e-mail of earlier today, especially the
suggestions, and write a proposal on how to improve the APNIC Policy
Development Process. Then we can all discuss that, and move onwards, and
forwards, to better things.

Please!!!!

philip
--