APNIC Home APNIC Home


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001



Ann and all,

Thank you Ann for your clarification as far as it is a clarification that is..

Indeed this was not a vote.  As such there is no consensus as without
a  means of measuring, consensus cannot be determined.  But we
have been here before haven't we Ann?

Anne Lord wrote:

> Chanki
>
> >
> > So my expectation was "A tie" or "can not decide"  instead of
> > "no consensus".
> > (This is the reason I call the chair's decision A MISTAKE)
> >
>
> One important clarification. This is not a vote. Therefore a "tie" or
> "cannot decide" does not exist in the policy development process.
> Both are states that indicate that there is no general consensus.
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> Anne
> --
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827