Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] CCWG ICANN Accountabilitysecond draft report -- numbers related analysis [9/12 comment deadline]
Please see inline below.
Thanks and best,
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net [mailto:ianaxfer-bounces@apnic.net] On
> Behalf Of Izumi Okutani
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 01:41
> To: <ianaxfer@apnic.net>
> Subject: [IANAxfer@apnic] CCWG ICANN Accountabilitysecond draft report
> -- numbers related analysis [9/12 comment deadline]
>
SNIP
>
> 6. Community Mechanism as Sole Member Model
>
> The first Draft Report suggested that these powers would be exercised
> by changing ICANN's structure into a membership-based organisation,
> with the SO/ACs as the members (Membership Model). An alternative model
> was also investigated, whereby the SO/ACs would become designators
> (Designator Model).
>
> During the public consultation and thereafter, objections were
> expressed to both of these models. As a result of further discussions
> and consultations, the second Draft Report introduces a new structure
> called the Sole Membership Model.
>
SNIP
>
> Do you have any comments with regard to this model?
Yes, see:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00002.h
tml
>
> Thank you,
>
> Izumi Okutani
> ASO representative for ICANN Accoutability CCWG
> _______________________________________________
> IANAxfer mailing list
> IANAxfer@apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer